{"id":639,"date":"2018-10-01T21:42:26","date_gmt":"2018-10-02T01:42:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/?p=639"},"modified":"2018-10-01T22:28:02","modified_gmt":"2018-10-02T02:28:02","slug":"tldr-kavanaugh-redux-or-baby-its-cold-in-washington-d-c","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/2018\/10\/01\/tldr-kavanaugh-redux-or-baby-its-cold-in-washington-d-c\/","title":{"rendered":"TLDR &#8211; Kavanaugh Redux, or, Baby It&#8217;s Cold in Washington D.C."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I am not a satirist.\u00a0 I had considered writing this as though I were; the problem is that since I am not, not only would it not be very good satire, it would run the risk of not even being recognized as satire.\u00a0 And so I write it as I write other things, whatever classification that is.<\/p>\n<p>I also usually do not repeat myself; <a href=\"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/2018\/09\/27\/tldr-kavanaugh-and-social-currency\/\">I have already written on the nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court and the various dramas surrounding that nomination<\/a>.\u00a0 However, this is an involved story, and several various trains of thought have coalesced into identifying themes and drawing relationships and parallels among the various actions being undertaken in Washington, D.C.\u00a0 Yes, we know these actions are consistent with previous actions, but in understanding how they are consistent, we as a nation can improve and progress beyond those actions.\u00a0 If we want to, that is.<\/p>\n<p>The first train of thought is this:\u00a0 I have seen recently on Facebook &#8211; and forgive me for not being able to find the source, for Facebook&#8217;s searching is poor, and its ability to consistently show a reliable history in my feed is even poorer; stories and posts jump around like grasshoppers fleeing before you in a field, and catching a specific one is just as improbable &#8211; but I have seen recently on Facebook a meme or a post wherein it is noted that the Republicans are trying to &#8220;ram through&#8221; the Kavanaugh nomination, and the women of the nation are saying, &#8220;no,&#8221; &#8220;stop it,&#8221; &#8220;we don&#8217;t want this.&#8221;\u00a0 It notes the powerlessness felt in such a situation.\u00a0 To put it bluntly, the Republicans are raping America; the metaphor is fairly strong and accurate.<\/p>\n<p>The second train of thought stems from the testimonies of Dr. Ford and Mr. Kavanaugh before Congress.\u00a0 It is not inconsistent that she remembers the incident but he does not; you remember when you are hurt, but if you don&#8217;t realize that you are hurting someone else, you are not likely to take note of it.\u00a0 Particularly if what you are doing is not outside of your normal\u00a0<em>modus operandi<\/em> &#8211; this is the way you have always done something and nobody has complained before, so what makes this special?<\/p>\n<p>Finally, a train of thought stemmed from the article written by Mr. Kavanaugh&#8217;s friend Mark Judge, where he writes &#8220;&#8230;there\u2019s also that ambiguous middle ground, where the woman seems interested and indicates, whether verbally or not, that the man needs to prove himself to her. And if that man is any kind of man, he\u2019ll allow himself to feel the awesome power, the wonderful beauty, of uncontrollable\u00a0male passion.&#8221;\u00a0 Clearly, Mr. Judge believes that if there is any ambiguity, then he is free to act as he sees fit.<\/p>\n<p>All of these led me to thinking about Frank Loesser&#8217;s 1944 song,\u00a0<em>Baby, It&#8217;s Cold Outside.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>There has been quite a controversy over this song.\u00a0 On the surface, it certainly sounds like a song condoning date rape &#8211; the &#8220;wolf&#8221; (he) is pressuring the &#8220;mouse&#8221; (she; roles as indicated in the original song) to stay the night with him.\u00a0 She comes up with excuse after excuse not to, but still he persists.\u00a0 It includes the line, &#8220;hey, what&#8217;s in this drink?,&#8221; which is really what puts this song into the uncomfortable area.<\/p>\n<p>However, there&#8217;s more to this song than meets the eye, as Tumblr user bigbutterandeggman wrote in an explanation of the song.\u00a0 This explanation has been reposted quite a lot across the internet; I quote, extensively but not\u00a0 in entirety, from that user&#8217;s post:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>That is the standard joke that\u2019s going on when a woman in media from the early-to-mid 20th century says \u201chey, what\u2019s in this drink?\u201d It is not a joke about how she\u2019s drunk and about to be raped. It\u2019s a joke about how she\u2019s perfectly sober and about to have awesome consensual sex and use the drink for plausible deniability because she\u2019s living in a society where women aren\u2019t supposed to have sexual agency&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>Basically, the song only makes sense in the context of a society in which women are expected to reject men\u2019s advances whether they actually want to or not, and therefore it\u2019s normal and expected for a lady\u2019s gentleman companion to pressure her despite her protests, because he knows she would have to say that whether or not she meant it&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>So it\u2019s not actually a song about rape &#8211; in fact it\u2019s a song about a woman finding a way to exercise sexual agency in a patriarchal society designed to stop her from doing so.\u00a0 \u00a0But it\u2019s also, at the same time, one of the best illustrations of rape culture that pop culture has ever produced. It\u2019s a song about a society where women aren\u2019t allowed to say yes\u2026which happens to mean it\u2019s also a society where women don\u2019t have a clear and unambiguous way to say no.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/bigbutterandeggman.tumblr.com\/post\/154013148291\/teachingwithcoffee-its-time-to-bring-an-end-to\">Tumblr, 2016\u00a0<\/a><\/p>\n<p>There are several items to consider here, but the key one is the last line:\u00a0\u00a0<em>it&#8217;s also a society where women don&#8217;t have a clear and unambiguous way to say no.<\/em>\u00a0 This is important &#8211; at one point, not that long ago, society gave women no way to say &#8220;yes.&#8221;\u00a0 This meant that &#8220;no&#8221; was ambiguous, and men had to rely on other clues to interpret the &#8220;no.&#8221;\u00a0 Clues like tone of voice, choice of clothing, whether or not she is drinking &#8211; these are all things that men have had to rely on to determine what was meant by &#8220;no,&#8221;\u00a0 Not coincidentally, these are all suggestions on various &#8220;helpful&#8221; lists on what women should do to not get raped; basically, don&#8217;t do anything that can be interpreted in any way as &#8220;no&#8221; meaning &#8220;yes.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is, of course, a very restrictive way to live, and women have been striving to move past that.\u00a0 It is evidence of the progress being made that\u00a0<em>Baby, It&#8217;s Cold Outside<\/em> is now uncomfortable &#8211; we don&#8217;t live in that society any more.<\/p>\n<p>Or rather, many of us don&#8217;t live in that society any more.\u00a0 Societal change does not often happen overnight, and a large portion of the population still lives as though women cannot say &#8220;yes.&#8221;\u00a0 They still live as though if a woman says &#8220;no&#8221; it is a mystery to unravel.\u00a0 They teach their children this same thing, so that this piece of history is handed down from generation to generation.\u00a0 The problem is, as identified above, this leaves a lot of room for &#8220;misunderstanding&#8221; and &#8220;misinterpreting.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>And projection.\u00a0 A lot of projection.\u00a0 When things are ambiguous, it is easy to see what you want to see, as though it were some sort of societal Rorschach test.\u00a0 Of course, we are the heroes of our own stories, so anything we project of course falls in our favor.\u00a0 This is why Mr. Kavanaugh does not remember any sexual assault happening &#8211; because, to him, what happened was not assault.\u00a0 It was simply his interpreting a &#8220;no&#8221; as ambiguous, which he had to do because he was not aware that a woman could say &#8220;yes.&#8221;\u00a0 What&#8217;s more, he cannot conceive that a woman would not want him, and thus all &#8220;nos&#8221; must be these concealed &#8220;yeses.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>This is not dissimilar to Donald Trump&#8217;s attitude as evidenced by his infamous quote from the\u00a0<em>Access Hollywood<\/em> bus incident, where he says,\u00a0 \u00a0\u201cWhen you\u2019re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything.\u201d\u00a0 In Trump&#8217;s mind, it would be irrational not to want him because he is, as he says, &#8220;a star.&#8221;\u00a0 He is rich and famous; therefore, everything a woman does is indicative of her desire for him.\u00a0 This is what happens when you combine the narcissism of Trump with that societal Rorschach test; every action is interpreted as ambiguous.\u00a0 Every contestant who enters one of his beauty pageants, every woman who says &#8220;no,&#8221; every woman who even meets him &#8211; they all become fair game.<\/p>\n<p>Even when not taken to the extreme of Trump, this mindset is pervasive &#8211; Mike Pence, for example, famously does not meet with women other than his wife one-on-one; this is an extension of that belief that everything a woman does is indicative of desire (and, possibly, and extreme amount of distrust or jealously from Karen Pence).\u00a0 This is, of course, aided by women who continue to live in the society where they cannot say &#8220;yes,&#8221; especially if they come from a large community of such women.\u00a0 The evidence they have firsthand is that this is still the way society works, and thus it only reinforces the notion that they can consider these protests from women for the sake of their body to be simply for the form of the matter.\u00a0 \u00a0Men like this don&#8217;t actually need to listen to the protests, the don&#8217;t need to consider things from another&#8217;s viewpoint &#8211; they see themselves as playing by the rules, and those protests are just a natural consequence of playing the game.<\/p>\n<p>It is bad enough, of course, that men like this still exist; that they have not stopped to take the pulse of society and alter their actions.\u00a0 \u00a0Some men have grown and learned; they have retrained themselves to the new rules of society and issued apologies for their previous actions.\u00a0 It is, unfortunately, the ones who have doubled down &#8211; the ones who not only are not apologetic, but insist that this is the way society should work &#8211; it is these men who are in power in Washington D.C.\u00a0 They are trying to do everything in their power to maintain or reinstate the society they are familiar with, to make sure that the rules are what the are comfortable with.\u00a0 This is, of course, a conservative approach, one of the rare times that lower-case conservatism actually overlays with upper-case Conservative ideology.\u00a0 In this administration, however, this society is one of cronyism and personal loyalty &#8211; loyalty not to country or position, but to an individual, and doing everything to further the ambitions of that one individual.\u00a0 There really is no way to correct this other than voting them (or the people supporting them) out of office.\u00a0 Protests don&#8217;t work on them, they consider these protests from others for the sake of their country to be simply for the form of the matter.\u00a0 Men like this don&#8217;t actually need to listen to the protests, the don&#8217;t need to consider things from another&#8217;s viewpoint &#8211; they see themselves as playing by the rules, and those protests are just a natural consequence of playing the game.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In which I explore the more themes interwoven through the Kavanaugh drama being played out in Washington, D.C.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[4],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=639"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":648,"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/639\/revisions\/648"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=639"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=639"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/coolskill.org\/site\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=639"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}